Go to page | Previous  1 ... 15 16 17 18 19  Next
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
   
In article <5oc0l41i11lpkomrqdvkbm0gmklp7g7qld@4ax.com>,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
Quote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:13:51 -0500, Kali wrote:


Heads up fuckwit..that describes Liberals. Im hardly a Liberal.

"Too lazy to look it up"... "heard it on local news"...

That's you. It's not liberal, it's what's wrong with people who vote
for idiots like GWB. Congratulations, you're one of those "low
information voters" pundits talk about.


Having a Liberal blither about "low information voters" ...the irony is
exquisite.

"Change"
"Michel Obama Speaks for Me"
"We can do it"

When asked what any of those mean..the average Liberal gets a dazed
look, a slack jaw and a trail of drool runs down their chins as they
ponder on the question itself, let along trying to come up with any
definition"

Like asking someone why on earth they would vote for Sarah Palin?

Low info voters tend to hang out with low info voters, so it's no
surprise that you got the responses you got in your personal poll.

Quote:
Change? well ah...you know..Change!

Change to what?

Dood! We need Change!!!

But what kind of change?

Ah..you know..the Change kind of Change!!!

Sounds like the idiots at Red State.

Quote:
Your an idiot. Have you any idea of politics?

Politics? Whats that?

Ah...yes...just as I said. Your an idiot

And...and..and you are a Reichwinger!!

And what does that mean?

You are a christian nazi!!

Im Buddhist

Your a Buddhist Nazi!

You realize thats incredibly stupid, right?

Ah....er....you suck!

(Sounds of rapid footsteps stomping away)

Hmm. Projection?

Quote:
When polled, 67% of Democrat voters

You realize that "Democrat voters" is incorrect. It's Democratic
voters. This is part of the reason why Republicans sound like
hillbillies when they discuss politics. I've never heard a Democrat
refer to a Republican as a "Republic voter". hth

Quote:
didnt have a clue what programs and
agenda Barry wanted to put into place.

Where did you get that? Given your history of mistating statistics,
I'll assume you are incorrect until you back it up with a credible
source. I'd like to see these data.

Quote:
They did know he was black (at
6.5% of his genetic makeup)

LOL what difference does that make, and who came up with that
silliness? I'll bet you're at least 80% troglodyte.

Quote:
and the DNC was spewing the buzzword
"Change" so all was good. It made life easier for them to simply spew
"change!" and yet not make their brains itch by being forced to think
about any nasty programs and agenda.

I could argue that people who voted for McCain/Palin (and I could
make up a statistic as if it would make my b.s. seem more credible)
were voting *against* Obama. They weren't voting *for* McCain. I'd
have a much better argument than yours. McCain voters were the
"Nobama" voters.

Tell me why you voted for McCain and Palin, if you did.

--
Kali


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
news:2enphe.5a0.19.1@news.alt.net...
Quote:
"Kali" wrote in message
news:giotec$f62$20@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
big snip

Unfortunately superstitious bigots make up a fairly sizable
proportion of the voting public.

--
Kali


Yup, we men sure were fools to sanction women's suffrage.

--
Gregory Hall

And lettin' wimmins start swimming in the ocean, now all the fish smell
like "twat" !!

HJ


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:51:16 -0500, Kali wrote:

Quote:
In article ,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:32:01 -0500, Kali wrote:


Unfortunately superstitious bigots make up a fairly sizable
proportion of the voting public.


Indeed. In fact, they just elected Barry as president.

Gunner

They voted for Sarah Palin.

Liberals voted for Palin??????


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
news:lg03l4pue4toc72mmapde5mb3lfqkv6qfu@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:35:13 -0500, Kali wrote:


I could argue that people who voted for McCain/Palin (and I could
make up a statistic as if it would make my b.s. seem more credible)
were voting *against* Obama. They weren't voting *for* McCain. I'd
have a much better argument than yours. McCain voters were the
"Nobama" voters.

More than likely they did vote against Obama. Both choices sucked.

Tell me why you voted for McCain and Palin, if you did.

--
Kali

I voted for Barr.

LMAO.
You didn't vote for anyone.

JC


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
Gunner Asch wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:15:23 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
How do you drive with that long nose?
You are an antisemite on top of everything else. Fascinating

He who smelt it, dealt it.

In this case call yourself an anti-semite.

Blink blink.....

You realize just how stupid that made you look? Even more than I
thought was possible. You just ranged into UberStupid

Fascinating. Did you recently suffer a brain injury, or have you been
on a regime of dopamine inhibitors?

Gunner

Runner, you never cease to amaze. Why did you think Kali might be an
anti-Semite? Because she used a reference to Pinocchio??? Talk about
dense!

Dan


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
news:a_f4l.3684$jZ1.3114@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com...
Quote:
"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
news:lg03l4pue4toc72mmapde5mb3lfqkv6qfu@4ax.com...
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:35:13 -0500, Kali wrote:


I could argue that people who voted for McCain/Palin (and I could
make up a statistic as if it would make my b.s. seem more credible)
were voting *against* Obama. They weren't voting *for* McCain. I'd
have a much better argument than yours. McCain voters were the
"Nobama" voters.

More than likely they did vote against Obama. Both choices sucked.

Tell me why you voted for McCain and Palin, if you did.

--
Kali

I voted for Barr.

LMAO.
You didn't vote for anyone.

JC

No, I believe him. He wrote Rosanne's name in with a crayon.

--
Ed Huntress


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:50:15 -0500, Kali wrote:

Quote:
In article ,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:32:01 -0500, Kali wrote:

My marriage was illegal in some 15 states when we were married 40 years
ago. Stupid, fuck the church. Oh, wait, that's reversed...

Fuck superstition and bigotry.


You do realize you just diss'd the DNC, and Liberalism in general,
right?

Somehow, in your twisted thoughts?


Nope, in the Real World

Something you evidently escaped from years ago.

Quote:
Gunner



 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:47:35 -0500, Kali wrote:

Quote:

You strongly believe that little boys are delicious also.

Nah, that's a Republican thing.

http://www.republicansexoffenders.com/

Doesnt speak well for your belief system now does it?

Gunner



--
Kali


Id say you were being hypocritical again..and again...again.....

http://www.democratsexoffenders.com/

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2 ... ls-in.html

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1743276/posts

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712590/posts

My "Mark Foley Moment": How GOP vs. Dems Treat Their Sex Offenders

By Debbie Schlussel

While liberal Democrats snicker over Florida Congressman Mark Foley's
sex scandal--his graphic e-mails with underage pages, they really need
to look at their own side of the aisle in Congress.

Foley resigned, as he should have, and Republican's called for an
investigation. Now, the libs are screaming and yelling about "What did
the GOP know and when did they know it." But the fact is that whenever
GOP leadership learns of a likely illegal sex scandal involving their
members, they've always called for his (there have not yet been any
"hers," but someday there will be) resignation.

markfoley.jpgbarneyfrank.jpg
Rep. Mark Foley Wrote Inappropriate E-Mails, Ousted by GOP;
Rep. Barney Frank Did Much Worse, Celebrated by Dems

I know this first-hand. When I was in high school and college, I worked
as an intern on Capitol Hill for three Republican Congressman--Mark
Siljander of Michigan, Phil Crane of Illinois, and Donald E. "Buz"
Lukens of Ohio. During my junior year of college, just after I worked
for Lukens, he was caught in a sex scandal, broken by tabloid show "A
Current Affair" (then hosted by Bill O'Reilly). Lukens was blackmailed
on tape (all set up and arranged by the FOX show) by a teen-age
prostitute and her mother, who was apparently her pimp and "marketed"
her as "of legal age." Lukens was apparently one of their "customers."

It gave new meaning to the Christmas cards he sent me that said "Debbie,
We hardly knew ye." It was the other way around, apparently. I hardly
knew him. Still, I felt bad for him--it was a sleazy situation created
in part by a sleazy, sick pimp mother (to whom nothing happened) and a
sleazy TV show whose host now claims he's a "culture warrior." Buz
Lukens was always nice to me (no, not in that way) and all of those who
worked for him. And I saw him lose everything. He lost his Congressional
seat, the scant money he had, was forced to take AIDS tests, and had to
attend sex offender education. He lost everything.

Of note is how Republicans treated the situation. The House GOP
leadership immediately called for an ethics investigation and Lukens'
resignation. When Lukens refused, GOP leadership recruited a primary
opponent whom they supported against Lukens. The man, John Boehner,
won--and, as a Congressman and GOP Majority Leader, now plays a lot of
golf and pressures ICE not to deport Muslim illegal aliens in his
district.

Contrast his and Mark Foley's treatment with the way Dems treated
Congressman Barney Frank, a gay, far-left Massachusetts Democrat. In
1985, he engaged the "services" of gay prostitute Stephen Gobie, who
advertised in the Washington Gay Blade that he had a "hot bottom." Soon
Gobie was Frank's live-in boyfriend, and Frank was soliciting the House
clerk to clear Gobie's many traffic tickets. And Gobie was running his
prostitution business, clear as the day, out of Frank's Washington, DC
residence.

And there's more. According to The Boston Globe:

He [Frank] and Gobie carried on a clandestine affair, during which
time Frank hired Gobie as a driver despite knowing Gobie was on
probation for drug possession and for possession of child pornography.
Frank used his House privileges to fix Gobie's parking tickets. He wrote
a memo trying to clear Gobie from probation that was disingenuous at
best and an outright deception at worst.

So what happened to Frank for illegally hiring a prostitute, for fixing
that prostitute's tickets, for trying to fix the guy's probation, and
for allowing the prostitute to run his "business" out of Frank's
Congressional residence? Nada. Nothing.

And guess who was in charge of the House of Reps. then? Hint: It wasn't
the GOP. And guess what they did about it? Hint: NOTHING. And guess what
else? No-one asked, "What did the Democrats know and when did they know
it?" By the way, they never called for an ethics investigation of Frank.
The GOP did, but since they didn't run Congress then, nothing happened.
And there were never any calls for his resignation by the leadership of
his party. None.

The e-mails by Mark Foley are outrageous and unacceptable. He should
have been ousted, as he was. There is no indication that he ever went
beyond e-mails with House pages or that Republican leadership knew of
the more explicit e-mails, just the more benign, but suspicious ones.
But he is gone.

And all the Republican sex offenders are gone--ousted by their own
party's leadership. But Barney Frank is still there. And he's celebrated
by Democratic Party leaders. Tells us all we need to know.

Ditto, regarding Monica's boyfriend.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... ed_by.html

Sex Offender Legislation "Blocked by Democrats"

Dems again protecting their own.


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:45:13 -0500, Kali wrote:

Quote:
In article <8od0l4lrdadmoe9rov2kvu2h125pit59b7@4ax.com>,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:20:31 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:24:47 -0500, Kali wrote:

In article ,
gunner@NOSPAMlightspeed.net says...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:35 -0700, Masp Erewhon wrote:

Like the exit polling in California. People said they voted for Proposition 8
because "God made man and woman. He didn't make man and man or woman and woman,"
or they cited Leviticu


Cites?

Odd though...80% of "liberal Californians" voted for Prop 8

California..the Blue State, Owned operated and mismanaged by
Leftwingers....

and 80% of them voted to ban gay marraige

Now Moonbeam Jerry claims gay marraige is a "fundimental right"

Gay marriage was a right in California for a short time. Then those
rights were taken away.

So was the right to own slaves. Then it was taken away. Im sure you
are also upset about that.

Slavery was recognized in the Constitution as a reality (3/5ths
clause) but not as a right.

Nor was Gay Marraige.

In California, the Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a
constitutional right.

Absolutely incorrect. They ruled it was permissible, and had no impact
on straight maraige, but didnt rule that it was a Right. Only
discriminatory

"California's cautious and moderately conservative Supreme Court ruled
today that same-sex couples should be permitted to marry, rejecting
state marriage laws as discriminatory. In a 4-3 decision, the justices
said the state's ban on same-sex marriage violates the "fundamental
constitutional right to form a family relationship."
Quote:
Prop 8 took that constitutional right away.

See above. Refutes your double lies.
Quote:
Only in certain states was slavery and gay
marraige so recognized.

Who/what's next? Guns?

In California? Your ilk

My ilk?

You are even more stupid than I thought.
Pity.

You assume that I have a problem with the 2nd amendment?

All Liberals do. Else they wouldnt be Liberals.
Quote:
has already declared the 2nd Amendment And the
right to keep and bear arms provisions of the California Constitution to
be null and void.

And you are bitching? Hypocrit!

I don't have any problem with your guns.

Then get on your bretherans case about it. You know..your Ilks.

Typical black/white thinking. Unsophisticated. No wonder you lose
arguments time and time again, yet seem to not know it.

I lose very few arguments. My opponents go into denial, stamp their
widdle feet and scream " IIIIII Cannnnntttt HEEER YOUUUUU"
Quote:
Ever think? Does it hurt?

Nope. Im not a leftwing fringe kook extremist. Thought to them is
anithema.

You're so far to the right wing that you probably consider most
centrists as "far left".

Centrists like Karl Marx?

What about Karl Marx? I don't know anyone who would consider his
ideology centrist.

Then why are you calling liberals Centrists? They are at the least
Socialists/Progressives, which Marx indicated was the beginning of
Marxism.
Quote:
Low information voter, or stupid?

Id vote that you were stupid. So far, you havent proven me wrong on it.
Quote:
Fascinating


Gunner, who voted Against Prop 8

I note you keep ignoring the fact I voted IN FAVOR of gay marraige.

Who?

See 4 lines up.

And you did it without understanding what it really meant.

Keep telling yourself that, stupid.
Quote:
But then...it must not be comprehensible to you as Im a Conservative, so
it simply doesnt register in that pathetic oatmeal filled skull of
yours.

And Kali you are not.

Not what?

Any sort of Kali

Do you drink and post?

I see you know nothing of what your nym refers to. Did you pick it
because it sounded nifty? Like "change"?
Quote:
Do you realize you are responding to multiple persons in this post?

Of course. And you are all buffoons.

Like addressing a plate of garden slugs. All the same exept in size of
slime trail.

Are all gays alike?
Are all blacks alike?
Are all women alike?
Are all liberals alike?
Are all conservatives alike?

Interesting question. Based on the Liberal view as expressed on Usenet,
Id have to say they would say Yes.
Quote:
Are you Archie Bunker?

Nope. However we have found you to be Stupid.
Quote:
Folks used to call me Shiva for some reason. Maybe because I smile a
lot.
Gunner


 
 Post subject: Re: a welling of disdain
PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:08 am 
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:35:13 -0500, Kali wrote:

Quote:
I could argue that people who voted for McCain/Palin (and I could
make up a statistic as if it would make my b.s. seem more credible)
were voting *against* Obama. They weren't voting *for* McCain. I'd
have a much better argument than yours. McCain voters were the
"Nobama" voters.

More than likely they did vote against Obama. Both choices sucked.
Quote:
Tell me why you voted for McCain and Palin, if you did.

--
Kali

I voted for Barr. I got tired of holding my nose at election time.

Now tell us why you voted for Barry.

Gunner


 
Go to page | Previous  1 ... 15 16 17 18 19  Next





SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
  0x61.com 2009-2010 - Internet Forums and much more!